Fighting for Social Change

One way independent journalism can make a huge impact on their society is to use their power to encourage social change.  This was huge in the 1960s when supporting the counterculture was revolutionary. In chapter 11 of Roger Streitmatter's "Voices of Revolution", he tells the story of revolution for social justice, with the common themes of sex, drugs and rock 'n roll. These themes have never been seen before in the United States. What helped spread the idea of social revolution were the independent journalists that rose across the country.

The Berkley Barb started in California in 1965, founded by a guy named Max Scherr. Scherr sold his Steppenwolf Bar for $10,000 to start the weekly paper, and soon became a leading voice for the counterculture. In 1969, the newspaper gained much popularity for the coverage on the Cal-Berkley campus when students planted trees and flowers in a university-owned lot that was meant for a soccer field and dormitories. Scherr was able to make it national news through his paper, and grabbed the attention of the nation. He spoke for the counterculture, saying, "The creators of our Park wanted nothing more than to extend their spirits into a gracious green meandering plaything. They wanted to make beauty more than an empty word in a Spray Net commercial."

Other Berkley papers such as the Berkley Gazette focused on the interests on the counterculture, magnifying the social status quo they were resisting, such as smoking pot. Police and the National Guard were called to Berkley to clear the "riff-raff", which brought 20,000 students to peacefully protest the whole thing. The police then killed one of the demonstrators, along with injuring many others. Public opinion soon sided with The Barb and after 13 days, Reagan pulled the troops, and the university allowed the lot to be a park. The Barb now resembled a protector of the people.

The Paper was started by Michael Kindman in 1965 as well, although The Paper started in East Lansing, Michigan. Kindman was a journalism major at Michigan State University (MSU). He too supported the counterculture after he didn't like working for the school paper. The Paper focused on campus affairs, helping the students have a say in how their institution functions. Alongside such stories, Kindman wrote about drugs and his own experiences with them and expressing how it has been a positive in his life. In 1966, The Paper wrote on anti-Vietnam war and anti-university positions, and in the meanwhile exposing an alliance between MSU and South Vietnamese dictator Ngo Dinh Diem. The Paper questioned any military involvement by a school. The Paper was no longer supported by MSU, but the staff worked for free and printing was paid by the revenue, so they stayed in existence.

In the most conservative part of the country, The Kudzu was founded by David Doggett, a student at Millsaps University in Jackson, Mississippi. Doggett wanted to support the Civil Rights and Counterculture Movements in a place where not one publication publicly supported radicalism. Named after a vine that grows rapidly in the South, Doggett hoped for The Kudzu to spread in a similar manner. Young adults were ready to hop on the counterculture train, but the biggest obstacle for The Kudzu was the police and their attempt to shut the newspaper down. They would arrest people attempting to sell copies, including Doggett, and they would be brought back to the station for questioning and would be kicked and beat by police. Further more, police would charge them with obscenity, and would confiscate their journalist equipment like cameras and notepads. After beating them, charges would be dropped.

This is the sort of fight it takes to challenge and change the status quo. Humans appear to have a trait to fear change. In this instance, the young people are trying to start something new, something people have never seen before. People in power start freaking out because there is a sense of lost control. The fear of breaking social tradition brings about a war between tradition and change. What is hard to accept for all of us is that change is inevitable, no matter how much power someone or something has. The more that people in power try to control the revolutionaries, the revolution grows stronger, as seen in these recent examples. Independent media plays a huge part of feeding moral to those not in power, and gives reasonable hope to the hopeless. Thus, another example of who has the true power, the people. Independent media served as the voice of these people during the Counterculture movement and proved to be a valuable tool for starting a revolution.

On Money for Independent Journalists, and Journalists In General

One thing that repels journalists from becoming independent is that it doesn't guarantee a life of luxury. If someone works independently, they don't do it for the money, they do it for the passion they have for that particular interest. Journalism does not pay well anyway, at least in the beginning stages of the career.  As a person that's learning about the world of journalism at Ithaca College, one of the first things that becomes clear is that I am not studying journalism to make money. It sounds crazy though, my family spends $50,000 a year for me to go to Ithaca College to learn from the some of the best people, from the journalism field, in the country. This includes students and professors, I truly meet fantastic people here that have, without a doubt, helped me develop into the person I knew I could be. But the biggest obstacle is the money.

According to CNN Money, journalists, on average, earned $32,000 after graduating college in 2012, which is $1,000 more than the previous year so at least there is an incline. However, the average salary out of all college graduates was $42,666 in 2012 so it is a below-average paying job.

The benefit I see from this is that journalists get to work with people that share a similar passion, at least in the early stages of the career. I interned at the Troy Record, my hometown newspaper, which is located in Troy, NY, 5 minutes up the Northway from Albany. Besides witnessing the dangers the print industry is going through, the people there were amazing. I looked forward to going there every time and everyone I met really cared about what they were doing and it was truly inspiring. I was interning with the sports department, so they were the people I became the closest with. It makes sense really, no one does sports journalism unless they LOVE sports. It is so easy to find a common interest, let alone the fact they all like writing. Besides, it's not about being rich but it's about being wealthy, and the journalism experience with newspaper was certainly rewarding.

There is a different world of journalism that journalists can choose to live on instead. That is to go independent. The typical model of career progression for journalists is to start small and to work their way up through bigger markets, eventually reaching the New York Times' and the Chicago Tribunes' of the journalism industry. That's just the print industry's example but it works the same way in television news. But there's the option of going independent, which some deem the contrary of professional. It's like anything else though, you get what you put into it. It can be a hobby, it can be a career. However, no one pays you for the work.

I read an article on how one can not only make money, but can make much more than $32,000 a year by being independent. It's gist is that you only 1,000 "True Fans" to earn money in the independent media industry. "A creator, such as an artist, musician, photographer, craftsperson, performer, animator, designer, videomaker, or author – in other words, anyone producing works of art – needs to acquire only 1,000 True Fans to make a living," said the Technium, defining a True Fan as "someone who will purchase anything and everything you produce." True fans don't grow on trees, but 1,000 isn't that high of a number.

Say those fans donate a mere $100 dollars per year. Multiply that times 1,000, and you are earning $100,000 a year. That brings the question how to get true fans. Well for one, if you receive one fan every day, it will take only 3 years to reach 1,000. Being 25 and earning $100,000 a year? Where do I sign up?

The hardest part is starting, but it's the same for every independent journalist. Your mom will comment on it, then share it. Eventually, the spark starts the fire. All that's left is you needing something to write about.

Maybe it's not as easy as 1, 2, 3, but the numbers don't lie. If you were once afraid to enter the journalism career because you feared you could not support you and your family, fear no more! There is so much opportunity when it comes to the independent media field. Just write what you want, and stay close and true to your fans and they’ll return the favor. The article makes another good point by saying it is very rewarding to interact with fans that truly appreciate your work.

In summary, write about whatever you please, receive love, give love back, next thing you know you are getting paid for being awesome. It’s the perfect crime!

Jeter's Baseball Playing Death Leads to a Newborn Journalism

Former Yankees shortstop Derek Jeter may have retired this offseason, but that doesn't mean the Captain is done working. Jeter announced three days after his final game that he is the founding publisher for his new website "The Player's Tribune".

Jeter announced this by writing his first piece of work for The Player's Tribune. On October 1st, 2014, Jeter wrote "The Start of Something New", introducing his life after baseball. What is unique about Jeter's new publication is that it will be staffed by athletes (I am assuming active and retired athletes) that will edit and contribute to the publication.

The Player's Tribune posted on their website that it "aims to provide unique insight into the daily sports conversation and to publish first-person stories directly from athletes. From video to podcasts to player polls and written pieces, The Tribune will strive to be 'The Voice of the Game.'” In Jeter’s introduction, he states that his goal “is for the site to ultimately transform how athletes and newsmakers share information, bringing fans closer than ever to the games they love.”

What I am taking from both of these statements is that Jeter is looking to eliminate the middle man, meaning the reporters, by having the articles read by fans be written by the athletes they want to know about. Fans will get a first person perspective of the athlete, and the athlete will be able to say what he or she wants to say without it being misinterpreted.

Sean Gregory, who wrote an article on the Player’s Tribune for Time, claims that there is an irony to Jeter’s new website. Gregory says that, “The irony of Derek Jeter, distruster of media, starting a media business is outright comical,” and that, “Jeter’s pitch is that the site has ‘no filter.’ But don’t expect real honesty here. Twitter already works too well for that.”

I can partially see where Gregory is coming from when he says this. This website is just a longer form of Twitter, athletes can now express themselves in more than 140 characters which will be more throughout and less of an outburst. However, the articles may be taken as seriously as tweets themselves. Typically, it would be hard to trust a publication that the authors write about themselves. Certainly there is a conflict of interest.

But I think it is wrong to say that it is ironic that Jeter started The Player’s Tribune. If anyone were to start a publication of this sort, it would be Derek Jeter. Jeter is starting this media business because he is the “distruster of the media”, so he is creating media that, he believes, can be trusted. He’s never been anti-media; he’s bringing something to the journalism industry that has never really been seen before. It appears that Gregory is accusing Jeter of hypocrisy rather than originality.

Jeter says it himself in his first piece, “I do think fans deserve more than ‘no comments’ or ‘I don’t knows,’” and that, “I learned early on in New York, the toughest media environment in sports, that just because a reporter asks you a question doesn’t mean you have to answer.” Jeter knows that he wasn’t ever the flashiest guy in the conference room; he knew what sports reporters were looking for. He helped avoid distraction, he was a team player. To say that it is comical that he started a media company it wrong. It is genius, but maybe I just have a poor sense of humor. What's funny is how Jeter never ceases to amaze us.

I don’t think Sean Gregory is taking shots against Derek Jeter, I just don’t think he is looking at this accomplishment in the right way. He’s right in describing how Jeter handles the media. The point he is missing is that the website is a way for other athletes to express themselves and their lives in a way that Derek Jeter did. Jeter built his own image. He didn’t let reporters eat away at his flesh as they do to other athletes. Reporters have a tendency to do this, and because of that, we get athletes with images as ugly as flesh eating zombies rather than the human beings that they are.

This website will help players build there own images without any interference from the reporters. It creates an opportunity for fans to really get to know their favorite athletes, and will create a new bridge between the fan bases and the athletes, creating a new network community.

“I’m not a robot,” said Jeter, “Neither are the other athletes who at times might seem unapproachable. We all have emotions. We just need to be sure our thoughts will come across the way we intend.”

“I’m in the process of building a place where athletes have the tools they need to share what they really think and feel.  We want to have a way to connect directly with our fans, with no filter.”

Gregory, Sean. "Dull Derek Jeter's New Site Could Actually Be Cool." Time. Time, 1 Oct. 2014. Web. 9 Oct. 2014. <http://time.com/3453529/derek-jeter-players-tribune-website/>.

http://www.theplayerstribune.com/

Nieto's Plot Failure Displays Power of the People in a Presidential System

So this is my first blog ever, it's such an exciting experience. I mean, the entire world can see me; to think we all once thought the world was flat... Hi Mom!

My purpose of this blog is to learn about this experience called "blogging". My eyes have been opened to this world of independent media, and my ophthalmologist was Professor Jeff Cohen, oddly enough my Independent Media Studies' professor at Ithaca College.

At the top of our syllabus, there is a quote by Bill Moyers that said, "What is really important for the journalist is not how close you are to power, but how close you are to reality." I am a Sportscenter zombie and the only news channel I watch is ESPN. So I am fairly ignorant to other media powers, however, it is becoming clearer to me how much power large media corporations possess. It's a power so uncanny, it can control society as the legendary Illuminati would. Social standards, public good, magnifying unimportant issues, you name it. Public opinion can switch at the click of a television remote.

I read the article from the link below, and it reminded me of the power of large media corporations. According to the article, 95 percent of homes have televisions in Mexico, 30 percent have access to cable. In terms of news outlets, there are two main channels, Televisa and TV Azteca. These two outlets dominate news coverage in Mexico, thus they have a lot of influence on the public. Presidential candidate Enrique Peña Nieto, governor of the State of Mexico, knew of this power and wanted to use it to his advantage. It was reported that Nieto paid Televisa $90 million to promote himself and his campaign. There were other reports that Nieto paid over $3 million to journalists who gave more positive coverage on him.

Once the people found that this was true, hundreds of thousands marched throughout Mexico City, marching towards the Angel de la Independencia statue. The crowd was chanting, “The people, quiet, will never be heard,” protesting against Enrique Peña Nieto. The protesters call themselves “Yo Soy 132” and “Mas de 131”, after 131 college students protested together online through YouTube. These protesters are joining the 131 and believe their needs to be a free campaign.

What this group decided to do was to use the power they used on YouTube and organized a debate that would broadcast on YouTube for a fair debate. It was Mexico’s first-ever presidential debate organized by anyone other than the government’s federal elections commission (Flannery). Enrique Peña Nieto didn’t attend this debate, knowing the crowd would not favor him, believing the environment would fail to “guarantee a space of neutrality.” So the debate had only one empty stand, Nieto’s space. It’s unusual to have an empty stand in any political debate no matter what country you’re in. Duncan Wood, a professor at ITAM, said that Nieto’s decision not to show up, "damages his image in terms of his commitment to democratic discourse,” and that, “The empty seat was emblematic."

I take two things from this story. One of which I already mentioned, and that is the power of large media corporations. This power makes me think that Mexico isn’t the only country that abuses their power in this way. Not that I have any proof, but I wouldn’t be surprised if under-the-table payments are made for people to make themselves look good.

But what I also take from this article is that although large media corporations have so much power, it still is not as much power as the people have. Nieto’s attempt to brainwash his community through bias ads could have worked. Luckily, with an investigation and brave college students, the people were able to organize their own debate and regain power in their own election. Events like these are perfect examples of how independent media and “no-names” can make an impact in the world.

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/mexico/120620/televisa-yosoy132-protest-presidential-debate-mexican-election